West Point professor Col. Ty Seidule: Of course the Civil War was about slavery

source: youtube

  • For the misinformed "states' rights" history buff in your life: "Was the Civil War About Slavery?" - Col. Ty Seidule, history professor at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, settles the debate once and for all
  • "Muh states rights!": No, The Confederacy Fought To Preserve American Chattel Slavery During The Civil War As Told By Colonel Ty Seidule, Professor Of History At The United States Military Academy At West Point
  • West Point professor Col. Ty Seidule: Of course the Civil War was about slavery
  • Colonel Ty Seidule for Prager University: Was the Civil War About Slavery?
  • Was the Civil War About Slavery? What a great ending!
Topics: videos , EnoughLibertarianSpam , tcot , Conservative , BlackLivesMatter , history , pjnet , BLM , CivilWar , teaparty
  • ...
    Rhiannon Williamson
    just about every confederate state issued a declaration of independence and succession and in most if not all of those declaration slavery is mention with in the first paragraph as the cause and the reason for the succession **south carolina** The people of the State of South Carolina, in Convention assembled, on the 26th day of April, A.D., 1852, declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union; but in deference to the opinions and wishes of the other **slaveholding** States, she forbore at that time to exercise this right. Since that time, these encroachments have continued to increase, and further forbearance ceases to be a virtue. **Georgia** The people of Georgia having dissolved their political connection with the Government of the United States of America, present to their confederates and the world the causes which have led to the separation. For the last ten years we have had numerous and serious causes of complaint against our non-slave-holding confederate States with reference to **the subject of African slavery**. They have endeavored to weaken our security, to disturb our domestic peace and tranquility, and persistently refused to comply with their express constitutional obligations to us in reference to that property, and by the use of their power in the Federal Government have striven to deprive us of an equal enjoyment of the common Territories of the Republic. This hostile policy of our confederates has been pursued with every circumstance of aggravation which could arouse the passions and excite the hatred of our people, and has placed the two sections of the Union for many years past in the condition of virtual civil war **Mississippi** In the momentous step which our State has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course. **Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world.** Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and **a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization.** That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin. **Texas** at least words it like an actual document of law The government of the United States, by certain joint resolutions, bearing date the 1st day of March, in the year A.D. 1845, proposed to the Republic of Texas, then *a free, sovereign and independent nation* [emphasis in the original], the annexation of the latter to the former, as one of the co-equal states thereof, The people of Texas, by deputies in convention assembled, on the fourth day of July of the same year, assented to and accepted said proposals and formed a constitution for the proposed State, upon which on the 29th day of December in the same year, said State was formally admitted into the Confederated Union. The controlling majority of the Federal Government, under various pretences and disguises, has so administered the [federal territories] as to exclude the citizens of the Southern States, unless under odious and unconstitutional restrictions [editor's note: "unconstitutional restrictions" means the prohibition on slavery], from all the immense territory owned in common by all the States on the Pacific Ocean, for the avowed purpose of acquiring sufficient power in the common government to use it as a means of destroying the institutions of Texas and her **sister slaveholding States**. . . . When we advert to the course of individual non-slave-holding States, and that a majority of their citizens, our grievances assume far greater magnitude.